Services designed for lifecycle execution.
Delivery framework

Services designed for lifecycle execution.

From procurement and provisioning to fulfilment and IT asset recovery, services operationalise the lifecycle model globally.

The challenge

Hardware alone does not create operational consistency.

Even with structured catalogues, execution fails when services vary by region or rely on uncontrolled third parties.

Provisioning methods, fulfilment standards, data handling, and retirement processes must be consistent and governed. Otherwise, service variance undermines global standards.

Consistency is created through process, not product.

What this leads to

Operational fragmentation

  • Inconsistent provisioning standards
  • Uncontrolled logistics execution
  • Limited lifecycle visibility
  • Manual process dependency
  • Reduced audit readiness

Without service discipline, hardware discipline erodes.

Service architecture

Structured across the full lifecycle.

Our services align directly with deploy, manage, and retire phases.

Procurement services

Vendor coordination, forecasting alignment, and structured ordering governance.

Commerce services

API integration, ServiceNow integration, punchout, omnichannel ordering.

Provisioning services

Autopilot, Apple ADE, Android zero-touch, staging, labelling, and configuration.

Fulfilment services

Kitting, packaging, custom inserts, palletisation, regional distribution.

Logistics services

DDP delivery where legally possible, customs support, importer-of-record coordination.

ITAD services

Secure data sanitisation, recovery value management, circular redeployment.

Framework discipline

Services require governance.

Execution at scale depends on documented controls and unified standards.

Next step

Align your deployment model globally.

If rollout execution differs by region today, we can assess where structure can improve predictability and governance.